The Eye of God

Genre
Book Award Sub-Category
Book Cover Image
Logline or Premise
A self-taught philosopher finds enlightenment at the crossroads of science, technology, and deep metaphysical inquiries. Beginning with an epiphany during a casual summer day in 2019, Aeternus’ intellectual voyage spans across centuries of philosophical thought, from Plato to Einstein.
First 10 Pages

Chapter 1

I grew up and have lived my entire life in the southeastern

United States, a region American journalist H. L. Mencken

referred to as the Bible Belt in the 1920s. The states that make

up the region have less religious diversity than the rest of the

nation, with Protestant Christianity being the majority faith by

far. Only about half as many people in these states identify as

nonreligious compared to the national average. And people in

these states attend church more often than those who live in

most other states.

My own family were Southern Baptists, although I occasion‑

ally attended Methodist churches with friends. My grandmother,

who lived in the house next door, attended the First Baptist

Church, which you could see one block from our home. She

also taught Sunday school, played piano, and sang in church.

My mother’s oldest sister was just as devout as my grandmother

was. I remember my aunt singing the hymn, “I’ve got the joy, joy,

joy, joy” to me when I was a child. My father’s parents traveled

to churches as part of a gospel singing group, which is how my

mother and father first met. Growing up, I wasn’t aware of any‑

one not believing in God.

At some point in junior high school, when I was between the

ages of eleven and thirteen, I began to worry about the fate of

the souls who had not accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and

Savior. I was a boy scout, and my scout master was also a Christian

minister. I trusted him enough to share my doubts and concerns.

I remember asking him what he believed happened to the souls

of the Native Americans who had died before Christians colo‑

nized the country.

My trust in him was not misplaced. He agreed with me that

it did not seem right for their souls to be damned and burn in

hell for all eternity simply because they were not aware of Jesus

Christ. He also agreed, though, that scripture implied that any‑

one who did not accept Jesus would suffer this horrible fate. He

also acknowledged that I’d probably heard something during

church service that implied this as well. But then he said it was

his personal belief that even though that was what the Bible said,

and what some preachers said as well, he did not believe God

would do that. He believed instead that many Native Americans

were as good as any Christian and had their own beliefs in their

own way. He said he felt God would know and understand this

and not punish them unjustly.

At the time I can remember feeling relieved. It made sense

to me that God would know this. Also, it seemed possible to me

that some people, like the Baptist preacher I had heard preach‑

ing hellfire and damnation for any nonbelievers, just simply had

that wrong about God. But it wasn’t long before new doubts

and concerns arose in my mind. I remember sitting alone in

the woods while deer hunting as a young teenager wondering

about God knowing all my thoughts. This was a strange feeling.

Did I truly believe in God? Had I accepted Jesus Christ as my

Lord and Savior? I felt like an imposter. I felt there was a God,

and I felt he knew I was a fake Christian because I was having

doubts. I felt God knew that I was saying I believed, while not

truly allowing Jesus into my heart properly and walking the path

of the righteous as I should.

I made up my mind to turn to the source of truth itself: I

would read the Bible. I remember this felt like an incredibly

important task. I told a religious friend I was going to read both

the Old and New Testaments, cover to cover. I was surprised

when she got angry and said that it could not be done. This

seemed absurd to me. Of course it could be done. My aunt had

read both several times. All one had to do was to start and read

a little each night, not give up, and eventually the task would be

complete. She then countered that even were I to do this, I would

not understand what it said. Having not read both books before,

I found the idea of understanding the scripture completely a task

that I was less certain I could do, but I still believed in myself. In

hindsight, I am amazed now by how many people who profess

to be believers of any given religion have not actually ever read

their religion’s doctrine.

But I believe that I know why, because I did not have to read

far before I thought to myself, most of this is completely ridiculous!

I can remember telling another friend, “It all just seems like

the stories of the people at that time in those places.” He was

confused by this, and he asked me, “Do you mean like stories

that someone just made up?” At the time, I could not quite artic‑

ulate what I meant, so I told him, “They seem like the stories

people around here tell others about events. The people who

are telling the stories seem to believe them, and they say that

the stories are true, but you know that when you hear some of

these stories that they are far‑fetched.” He couldn’t accept this.

Later when the topic of God came up in our friend group, he

announced that I’d said that I believed the stories in the Bible

were just that, only stories told by people long ago and not the

word of God. Suddenly I felt as if it had been announced that

I did not believe that Coach Paul “Bear” Bryant was a good

football coach. Everyone laughed and turned to me smiling as

if I were the most foolish person on earth. One exclaimed while

laughing, “What?!”

I tried to explain myself. I asked the group, “What if, for

instance, when Moses led the Jews out of Egypt, they came to a

part of the Red Sea that usually had water, but for some reason

like drought or something, it did not. They crossed that area,

but later the Egyptians came along after them and they were

not able to cross because there was water there now. And then

the people who told the story believed that God protecting

them was the reason this had happened?” They all just stared

at me smiling, some shaking their heads. One person felt sorry

for me I think, or perhaps wanted the awkwardness to end, so

they tried to change the topic. Then one of them asked me,

“So you don’t believe in God?” I answered, “That is not what I

am saying. There is a God. But what if the Bible is just stories

written a long time ago by people? I’m saying I don’t think all

the stories happened exactly the way they are written, such as

people living for hundreds of years, and Jonah being swallowed

by a fish and surviving in its belly.”

Afterwards, I was offended that my belief in God had been

questioned simply because I raised concerns about the outland‑

ish stories I had read in the Bible. I searched within myself, and

I did believe that there had to be a reason and a purpose for

everything. I believed that the world and the people in it had

to have been caused by something. Surely this was God, but

it seemed more likely to me that people had just told all their

own stories about this one God, which was how all the various

religions and different beliefs had started.

In my early twenties, I joined the military as an enlisted mem‑

ber and left home for the first time. I don’t remember how, when,

or even why I decided that I no longer believed in God, but at

some point in my mid‑twenties, I decided that the cause of the

universe was the big bang, and the idea of a supernatural deity

was an absurdity. Over the next decade I would oscillate between

considering myself an atheist and considering myself agnostic.

Science was always my favorite subject in school. Perhaps

that’s why I was always questioning everything. I was far from the

best student in terms of attendance, doing homework, or getting

good grades. If school had consisted just of science, history, and

literature and I had been allowed to just read what I was curious

about or conduct my own experiments all day, I believe I would

have excelled. Instead, I was bored. Usually, I could be found in

class staring out the window daydreaming. I always scored high

on achievement tests and science tests in general, but I was an

underachiever academically before I joined the military.

Once in the military I was trained in computer science. It was

the mid‑1990s just as personal computers and public access to

the internet were taking off. I soaked up my training, finishing

in the top of my class. I embraced every new technology, and I

would spend countless hours reading, and testing and building

networks and systems. After my active‑duty tour ended, I made

a career in Information Technology (IT). I quickly became a

certified software engineer and a certified network and IT secu‑

rity specialist. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, I was on the

internet night and day reading about new scientific discoveries

and new technology.

Sometime during the fall of 2010, I read an article with a

sensational headline. The article’s title proclaimed that famed

English theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking had said that no

God was necessary for the creation of the universe. Hawking

claimed that the big bang was the result of natural laws of

physics. The article included excerpts from a new book, The

Grand Design, which Hawking had coauthored with US physicist

Leonard Mlodinow. In the excerpt, Hawking wrote, “Because

there is a law such as Gravity, the universe can and will create

itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there

is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why

we exist.” Hawking went on to say, “It is not necessary to invoke

God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.”

At the time, that seemed intuitive to me. I thought, of course

the beginning of the universe was caused by some natural law

like Gravity and not some conscious deity as we humans had

believed before we created the scientific method and began to

discover the laws of physics. I joked with my immediate family

members about what Hawking had said. I would say, “I believe

in an invisible force responsible for creating the whole universe,

and it is everywhere all the time, all around us, and it starts with

the letter G … ha! ha! It’s not God! It’s Gravity!” For almost a

decade, I gave little more thought to creation. In my mind, I was

now an atheist; there was no God. Gravity was the reason for the

big bang and that was the beginning of all existence. For me,

the matter was settled.

That all changed in 2019. A couple of years before, perhaps

in the late spring of 2017, or maybe 2018, I left home to go pick

up a family meal of boiled crawfish, potatoes, and corn from a

local restaurant. On the drive there I brought up Spotify and

saw there was a category for podcasts. I had never listened to a

podcast before, but I wasn’t in the mood for music. I browsed

for something educational and happened upon one called

Philosophize This! by Stephen West. I started with the first episode,

something about what West called pre‑Socratic philosophy. I had

never studied philosophy, but I had a general feeling for what it

was—and I’d heard of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.

I was immediately hooked. Once I had listened to all the

episodes of Philosophize This! out at that time, I moved on to The

Partially Examined Life podcast created by a group of people who

had all studied philosophy together at the University of Texas.

I then listened to History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps by Peter

Adamson, a professor of philosophy at the LMU in Munich and

at King’s College London, and In Our Time: Philosophy, hosted

by Melvyn Bragg.

I don’t remember which podcast I was listening to when I

had my epiphany in 2019. I remember it was a warm, sunny day

a few months prior to the COVID‑19 outbreak, so it must have

been the summer of 2019. I had gone to Wendy’s to pick up a

salad to take back to work for lunch. The podcast I was listening

to was describing the concept of God’s transcendence, a phil‑

osophical concept I was very familiar with by this time. As the

podcast described that the critical feature of transcendence was

the existence outside of creation as well as immanence inside

of creation, I nonchalantly said out loud to myself as I drove,

“Gravity is transcendent…”

In the next moment, I knew immediately what the cliché “it

hit me like a ton of bricks” meant. My brain suddenly seemed

to freeze. I felt a kind of panic, like I was not able to operate my

vehicle. It felt like I had stopped breathing. Should I pull off onto

the side of the road? I wondered. As all of this raced through my

mind, a single thought so big it seemed my head would burst,

tore through my brain. All I can describe it as would be a men‑

tal scream, “Gravity is transcendent!” I couldn’t comprehend

why I felt this way. I was still driving, but I wasn’t even aware of

where I was. I don’t think I was even sure what it meant or why

thinking it made me feel the way I did, but I couldn’t seem to

think of anything else.

***

For the past four years since that moment, I have been digging

into what philosophers call metaphysics, which deals with the

first principles of being and existence. This journey has taken

me through the ages of written human history. I have explored

the origins of religion and I have studied many different con‑

ceptions of God. I have dug deeper into philosophical thought.

Along the way I uncovered the beginnings of science and math‑

ematics. I studied the teachings of the greatest minds in human

history from Aristotle to Einstein. This book is a record of that

journey and the impersonal and universal truth about God that

I believe I have uncovered. It’s been hiding in plain sight for

hundreds of years.

Chapter 2

CURIOSITY, or love of the knowledge of causes, draws

a man from the consideration of the effect to seek the

cause; and again, the cause of that cause; till of necessity

he must come to this thought at last, that there is some

cause, whereof there is no former cause, but is eternal;

which is it men call God. So that it is impossible to make

any profound inquiry into natural causes, without being

inclined thereby to believe there is one God eternal;

though they cannot have any idea of Him in their mind,

answerable to His nature.

—Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651

Thomas Hobbes believed the seed of religion was in each of

us as we observed the cause and effect of the natural world

around us. He believed we each intuitively feel there must be

some first cause, and from that intuition springs all the various

religions as we try to dispel doubt and find an answer to satisfy

our curiosity. The beginning of religious belief likely predates

what we today consider written human history. However, according

to a 2023 Cambridge study, cave paintings may have been more

language than we initially thought and not solely artistic expres‑

sion.

Regardless, the seed of religion predates modern written

language, and we can only speculate at its origins.

The belief that supernatural forces govern our world likely

dates to tens of thousands of years ago. While the time period

that humans became self‑aware creatures able to consider their

own demise is a topic of great debate, I believe most scholars

would not put that date any earlier than 30,000 years ago, and

there are some who say 100,000 years ago or more. At some dis‑

tant point in our history, our ancestors began to ask the greatest

question man has ever asked, “How did I come to exist and why?”

The answer to that question has eluded humankind, until now.

One can imagine how terrifying the world must have seemed

to primitive man: volcanoes, earthquakes, lightening, thunder,

wind, rain, snow, and hail. At the same time, those early humans

probably experienced the sublime just as we do today, the maj‑

esty of mountains and the power of the seas, the beauty of the

sunrise and sunset. And as humans, just like us today, they likely

suffered from apophenia, the propensity to perceive connections

and meaning in unrelated events where no connection lies.

Mere probability meant that occasionally a human would

survive an unlikely encounter with a predator when their guard

was down. This must have felt like a blessing, a gift from fate.

At other times, loved ones would have met a mysterious demise

which surely seemed a curse. Anthropology shows us countless

examples of this kind of thinking throughout human history,

even to modern times. No doubt there are things we all generally

accept today as fact, which science will disprove in the future.

Not long after the ventrolateral frontal cortex of our ancestors

grew beyond that of our primate cousins, our ancestors obtained

the ability to imagine their own future and plan accordingly.